Chenbot
Host
We're Back!
Posts: 754
|
Week 9
Apr 14, 2013 9:00:47 GMT -5
Post by Chenbot on Apr 14, 2013 9:00:47 GMT -5
Here Shane will have 24 hours make his decision on whether or not to use the veto. If he chooses to use it on Marcellas or Natalie, then Roddy, as the only eligible houseguest, will be the replacement. Afterward, all houseguests except for Danielle's 2 final nominees will need to vote in their DRs. Danielle will vote in the event of a tie. You must give goodbye messages to BOTH nominees to count. Failure to do so will prohibit you from competing in the next HOH competition.
|
|
|
Week 9
Apr 14, 2013 12:00:53 GMT -5
Post by Shane Meaney on Apr 14, 2013 12:00:53 GMT -5
I figured we should get the ball rolling on this.
Welcome to the Power of Veto Ceremony
With this veto I have the power to take Marcellas or Natalie off the block.
I have decided...
Not to use the Power of Veto.
Marcellas...Natalie...you are two huge threats in this game. You are also the people that have either thrown my name around or announce that you were going to gun for me. It would not be in best interest for me to use the veto on one of you and put someone in danger that has never done me harm.
Good Luck to both of you
This veto ceremony is adjourned.
|
|
|
Week 9
Apr 14, 2013 13:16:30 GMT -5
Post by Gnatty Martinez on Apr 14, 2013 13:16:30 GMT -5
I respect your decision. However,
That is bullshit. I have never ever made a move against you OR suggested you would have to go OR gunned for you. The only things that happened were: - Hardy mentioning you had to go; I didn't argue against it since I didn't feel that was necessary when he was on the block. - I discussed with Roddy if there was a truth to Hardy's words. I did not go to Roddy to suggest you had to go at some point, I only discussed very briefly what Hardy had said and never said anything that could possibly harm you. - Last week I received PMs from Marcellas about some stuff going on and I decided to vote to keep him since he at least approached me while Kara did not. When the suggestion came that you and Roddy were close and had to be split up, sure I agreed, what else was I gonna say? And then, in Marcellas' defense he was probably just trying to save himself, which he succeeded in.
I might have agreed to things people said because it doesn't make any sense to go against what they say when THEY bring some idea up. I never brought up getting you out and I never did anything against you in this game. You probably have someone whispering in your ear and I'm totally not surprised, but you could have actually asked me if these things were true rather than simply assuming. I really thought we were cool and working together, until the moment you sent me that PM when I was on vacay, trying to work out a deal that you would keep me safe that week and whatnot. That PM made me wary because honestly I never thought of putting you up and it just showed me you didn't trust me enough apparently. It is what it is though and congratulations to whoever successfully put lies in your head.
I get that you think I'm a threat and you're probably closer to the others in this game than to me so I get your decision and it's all good, but to give me another slap in the face by saying these kind of things is totally unnecessary.
Good luck voting guys and good luck Marcellas.
|
|
|
Week 9
Apr 14, 2013 13:47:38 GMT -5
Post by Shane Meaney on Apr 14, 2013 13:47:38 GMT -5
Listen Natalie, If you're going to tell people what they want to hear when they bring stuff up to you...how am I suppose to trust anything you say to me? I know about the deal Hardy offered you if the votes were split. Although I don't think you really would have taken the deal because it was very obvious he would have turned on you, he seemed pretty damn sure that it was going to happen. If I were to confront you about it you would have either denied it or said "yea he offered a deal and I told him I would do it just to stop him from talking". How am I supposed to believe you? What if you're just doing the same to me? You should have just told Hardy the truth! Thats what I did even though I knew I was going to get burned for it.
You knew that how much of a threat I considered Marcellas to be. We've talked about since week 6. If you thought you and me were tight, you would have voted him out with me last week because you knew how much of a threat he was. You didn't even talk to me about it. You decided to vote Kara out and tell Danielle it was because you knew Kara and I were so close. Whether or not thats what you said, you still voted out Kara. Proof is in the pudding.
Good luck.
|
|
|
Week 9
Apr 14, 2013 14:19:05 GMT -5
Post by Gnatty Martinez on Apr 14, 2013 14:19:05 GMT -5
Listen Natalie, If you're going to tell people what they want to hear when they bring stuff up to you...how am I suppose to trust anything you say to me? I know about the deal Hardy offered you if the votes were split. Although I don't think you really would have taken the deal because it was very obvious he would have turned on you, he seemed pretty damn sure that it was going to happen. If I were to confront you about it you would have either denied it or said "yea he offered a deal and I told him I would do it just to stop him from talking". How am I supposed to believe you? What if you're just doing the same to me? You should have just told Hardy the truth! Thats what I did even though I knew I was going to get burned for it. I get what you mean but I don't see how this is relevant or how this matches with you saying I was planning to take you out. Like I said, I might have agreed to it (once!), but I never went out there to rally people against you and I never gunned for you. You claim in your veto ceremony that I did, but I didn't. You could have just said you didn't trust me because of such and such but now you're claiming I did things that I never did. What is that necessary for when I'm going to jury anyway? It's clear you didn't trust me and I get that, but I didn't do what you suggest I did. Communication goes both ways and you didn't talk about the vote with me either - I won't deny that I didn't feel that close to you anymore after you sent me that deal in PM. That again has nothing to do with the statement you made though because even if it was a move that made you wary of me, that still doesn't mean I brought your name up or that I'm gunning for you. That's just bullshit. On the contrary, I actually defended you a couple of times. And that thing about you and Kara being close? Really? I NEVER said such a thing. I didn't even communicate with Danielle during that vote.
|
|
|
Week 9
Apr 14, 2013 14:43:13 GMT -5
Post by Marcellas Reynolds on Apr 14, 2013 14:43:13 GMT -5
I've technically never done you harm, and explained my eviction speech to you, but it is what it is lova.
Good luck Nat-Attack!
|
|
|
Week 9
Apr 14, 2013 21:18:52 GMT -5
Post by Dustin McDreamy on Apr 14, 2013 21:18:52 GMT -5
Iiiiiiiiiit's EVICTION INTERVIEW TIME WITH YOURS TRULY!
Since it's the F5, I want everyone included!
|
|
|
Week 9
Apr 16, 2013 14:26:51 GMT -5
Post by Marcellas Reynolds on Apr 16, 2013 14:26:51 GMT -5
Sweet baby Jesus, Mary and Joseph already, could we move this along.
|
|
|
Post by Gnatty Martinez on Apr 16, 2013 17:33:44 GMT -5
AMEN
|
|
|
Post by Hardy Ames-Hill on Apr 16, 2013 19:34:20 GMT -5
You brought Joseph into it, you must be surrrrious, Marcellas!
|
|